
Michael Baillargeon
Short Clips
Michael Baillargeon
Michael Baillargeon brings a telecom and contact-center lens to the AI strategy conversation. He argues that companies should stop treating AI like a SKU and start treating it like an operating practice. The episode covers practical quick wins in call recordings and quality management, the risk of public GPT use, the role of LLM aggregators, why data cleanup matters, and the five-part sequence IT leaders can use to move from AI pressure to measurable business outcomes: stakeholders, outcomes, data, guardrails, and ROI.
We review circuit consolidation, contracts, security, outage visibility, billing, and future flexibility to reduce chaos without forcing change.
Navigate through key moments in this episode with timestamped highlights, from initial introductions to deep dives into real-world use cases and implementation strategies.
[02:21] Michael explains his path from English major and call center agent to telecom and IT leadership.
[04:48] The shift from on-prem PBX to cloud communications and why Cisco buying BroadSoft mattered.
[07:28] Why AI needs strategy first and why there is no simple SKU for AI.
[08:22] A practical AI quick win: analyzing and scoring customer calls at scale.
[11:28] How AI can surface recall signals, product demand, and voice-of-customer insights faster.
[13:38] The risk of employees putting PII, PHI, and company data into public GPT tools.
[14:26] How LLM aggregators can help protect sensitive information while giving users access to multiple models.
[22:43] Michael’s AI readiness model: stakeholders, outcomes, data, guardrails, and ROI.
[24:06] Why messy sources of truth create bad AI experiences.
[30:49] Why InfoSec and governance need to be part of the AI project from the beginning.
[33:39] Why leaders should start with business outcomes before talking to vendors.
[38:56] Michael’s closing reminder that AI is a marathon, not a sprint.

Phil Howard: Welcome everyone back to You've Been Heard. so Mike, here's the
thing. I After talking with IT leaders, we realized Nothing gets done in any
company without it touching it. But what we also realized is that whether people
want to admit it or not, nothing gets done without technology touching it. And
most people that are in a leadership role in technology right now, at least in
the mid-market space and enterprise space, didn't go to school for it, or they
might have gotten an MBA, they might have done, something related to it. But no
one grew up saying, I'm going to be a CTO or a CIO. We had bag phones back then.
We still had phones sitting on the wall with cords attached to it. the internet
was brand new. People were still very skeptical of it. And then here we are
today with AI, which is what we're supposed to talk about today. But even till
today, all the work that we've done as technology leaders, we get a seat at the
executive round table. We're not always heard that well. So the mission and
point of this, podcast is that, you know, it's great to have a seat at the
executive round table. How much nicer would it be to be heard? And a lot of C
level executives don't necessarily listen to their IT leadership. They have to
go to places like Gartner, and they have to go to places like insight, and they
have to pay them one hundred and twenty thousand dollars a year. And we like to
say, well, we'll give you Gartner level insight without the six figure price
tag, and we'll give you access to all kinds of people that will sanity check
decisions and everything and make you feel comfortable about what your CTO and
CIO already know. But this isn't about the, it versus the business or anything
like this. It's really about bridging the gap and making sure that we translate
and I guess, get to a point where everyone understands the words that are coming
out of the CTO and CIO's mouth. they may not know what hypervisor is or what to
do with that or anything, but they kind of understand at least enough to say, I
don't need to check with Gartner, who's going to assign an entry level college
student to your account. Does this sound familiar to you at all?
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. what's interesting is you hit on something. So, I was
an English major in college. I wanted to bring Shakespeare to the masses. And, I
ended up moving from New England out to Phoenix, Arizona. It had the thick
Boston accent at the time. It's kind of dwindled down a little bit, even though
people still say I have it. And, I ended up at a call center and I was a call
center agent. and I was an agent for, I don't know, maybe a year. And I realized
it's a hard job. Two. it's a challenging job. So, an opening came up in the IT
department to be like the junior phone system administrator. Now, I could spell
PBX. That was about all I could do. but I interviewed pretty well. And I tell a
good story. Right. That English teacher. You tell stories, remember what we tell
all our salespeople and what you tell all your IT professionals is, hey, numbers
tell, but stories sell. That's how to really get your point across when you're
at that leadership table. Give them the story. Just don't give them the numbers.
So, I ended up being the phone administrator on this million dollar. AT&T wasn't
even Lucent then. It wasn't even a buyer. It was AT&T, PBX and,
Phil Howard: thirty star codes,
Michael Baillargeon: and Unix boxes. And, I learned a lot.
Phil Howard: What's really wild about this story? Yeah. Is that I was an English
major, and my first technology job started off like this. I was in a call
center. and I remember the IT guys in the bullpen. We know, they were like, oh
yeah, we audited your call today. You shouldn't say. I'll never forget this
coaching conversation I got from my boss. You shouldn't say, Oh my bad. I was in
college and like, that's not professional. You shouldn't say my bad. but I got
moved to quest. Premier. That was the best. Yeah, it was a LAN party because
there was no security back then or anything like that. It was a daily LAN party.
So we only got five calls a day because it was like you had to have one hundred
cell phones or more account. Yeah. So we all had PCs networked together. We had
an OC twelve which was like unheard of. It was like unheard of. Yeah. Where is
this bandwidth coming from? I hadn't even had DSL yet at home. okay, so you
ended up in telecom. I ended up in telecom. And of course, the natural
transition is to all things technology from telecom.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. So, that company was kind of a BPO and then we lost
our two or three big customers. And then I went to the on prem PBX world. I
worked at Intertel and ShoreTel and Billy Bob Tel right. So very natural
progression. And then maybe in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, I had this aha
moment that the cloud is where. You mean no more hardware, no more power
supplies, no more patches, no, like well done in the cloud. I'm like, tell me
more. And I've just been cloud first for the last, almost ten years now. And
it's fantastic. But, I remember the big kind of part of that was, back in twenty
eighteen, I call it the UC earthquake. It's when Cisco bought Broadsoft. Think
of it. Right. Cisco. The biggest hardware manufacturer on the planet. And
Broadsoft the biggest soft switch on the planet. That signaled the decline of
the on prem PBX that day. You can pretty much put a stake in the ground because
it validated what you do every day and talk about cloud. It just validated that
and come full circle twenty eighteen. And the lockdown that was the biggest beta
of work at home ever, right? and that seemed to work out okay. We coming off
that this and now people are like, Mitel, they're discontinuing everything. If I
was discontinuing everything Cisco. They want to, but it's a little longer haul.
But I mean there's this graveyard out there of on prem pbxs that are no longer
valid. It's crazy how many clients I talk to who still say I have a Panasonic, I
have a Toshiba, I have a ShoreTel have an Intel and.
Phil Howard: Toshiba is great. Toshiba was the best key system. Yeah, so how do
we transition this all to AI? I have Greg on the call because every morning I
talk with him, he's like, oh, that's so like fifteen minutes ago. here was the
question. Right. If your CEO came to you tomorrow and said, show me an AI win in
ninety days. Where do you start?
Michael Baillargeon: To a few places. First of all, there's no skew for AI.
There's AI is not on a box on a shelf somewhere. And without an AI strategy, AI
as a two letter word. That's why MIT said ninety five percent of all projects
fail. and I think when CEOs, CTOs, VP of it, VP of sales read that, they might
say, why should we even try? Right. Why should we even try? If m I t say ninety
five percent, how can we possibly b b the five percent? Well, this and we'll get
to this, I think during a conversation about that readiness. but there's two
areas I think you can get a quick win. one is within your customer service,
customer care, customer experience, whatever you call your call center team,
your contact center team now. I know we're going to hear, but Mike, I'm not
Delta Airlines. We don't have a call center. Let's define a call center like
this. Phil. It's a group of hard working people that either gain new customers
or they retain customers, and it all adds up to revenue. Okay. Gaining retaining
revenue. That's what a call center does. Now they vary by size, scale, and some
complexity. But at the end of the day, that's my job. I want to make this
customer happy, or I want to make this customer buy something in that customer
experience world. A quick win would look like this. Wouldn't it be great? You
call into the call center and it says this call may be recorded or transcribed
for quality purposes. Phil, did you? Only three percent of those calls get
recorded, transcribed, listened to by a supervisor and then feedback given only
three percent.
Phil Howard: It's illegal. Asterisks check box that they have to check is
basically what people are doing.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah, one hundred percent.
Phil Howard: Like we want to record them. Somebody said at some point, the CEO,
I want to record everything in case we get sued or in case someone needs to
return something or lies and we have to pay out money. That's why they
ultimately, I'm assuming this is the reason why most people want to record
calls. Yeah. If you're somebody that's probably different, they're doing a lot
more. Q and a they're they're working on Csat scores.
Michael Baillargeon: You want to talk about that lawsuit. But, there's a very
technical term for it, and I might need Greg to help explain this. The term is c
y a. that's why they record those calls, right? To cover themselves. Now, what
if we could take that c y a and turn it into a profit center? What if I could
take one hundred percent of those calls, have AI listen to those calls and score
all my agents. based upon a rubric as a corporation, as a company, I make sure
they have validate their account number? Did they validate their date of birth?
did you upsell them all that? in that way I can make my people better because
Phil, you know as well as I do remote work is part of just about every company
on the planet these days. so, in the old days, I had a supervisor who would walk
past me and kind of listen, is my cussing out that customer? No, he sounds like
he's doing pretty good and he walks on. Right. But now I can't visit everybody's
house to do that. So how do I keep that quality level so high when everyone's
working remotely? we call that AI quality assurance or quality management or
quality metrics score one hundred percent of the calls. And then as a human in
the loop, I can still go into each of those. So if your best guy, you get to
ninety and ninety five. And then I see Mike's in the thirties. Why? Why is.
Phil Howard: Mike, can we take this a step further? Is there a way to do this
with. I mean, why wouldn't you do this with your salespeople? Why wouldn't you
do this with all of your inbound outbound calls? It would be great if we could
do it with our Zoom calls. So every Zoom meeting that my people run, like, could
we score that? That'd be cool.
Michael Baillargeon: That would be very cool. And then Phil, here's the other
thing. If you are an organization that has recalls, so you're in manufacturing,
whether it be physical devices or food manufacturing, give you a perfect
example. When I was at that BPO thirty plus years ago, we had Nestle was one of
our big customers and it took us about three weeks of anecdotal knowledge to see
that a certain dog food had an issue.
Michael Baillargeon: Now I can get it done in about three minutes. With AI, it
can surface that you've had ten calls in the last ten minutes about sick dog. So
it's just not surfacing about if I'm a poor agent and Phil's an amazing agent,
but more importantly, that voice of the customer, voice of the patient, voice of
the member, whether they actually talking about. Another perfect example. I
worked with this company. They make, cowboy boots, right? And they only made
square toe ones. Now, I'm not a cowboy boot person, Living up here in New
England. Not a lot of cowboy boots up here. But anyways, they only did the
pointy toe boots. they put on this AI q a q m, and then they learned that thirty
percent of the calls started with I'm on your website and I'm looking for square
toe boots, but I don't see them. Well, guess what? They started making square
toe boots. And now square toe boots are their number one seller. They would not
have known that if AI didn't surface that information. That's the power of AI.
That's a quick win, right? Of let's listen to the data we already have. We
already have all these call recordings. Let's listen to that data and figure
something out. That to me is your quickest win.
Phil Howard: What about the people that just don't necessarily have a big
contact center like, well, logistics, if we use logistics for an example, we
have a ton of inbound calls, people booking loads. we got a lot of outbound
calls doing temp checks and like checking where the loads at, quality assurance
from that standpoint. So there's one example there. health care. We've got
patience and I'm assuming scheduling is kind of a big one. this is all kind of
like telecom examples. Do we have any other examples that are just non-telecom
maybe?
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah, I think there's one question I've been asking IT
leaders quite a bit is, do you think your, coworkers may be talking to a public
GPT pick your poison, right?
Michael Baillargeon: Cod grok chat.
Phil Howard: We know they are.
Michael Baillargeon: We know who they are, the usual suspects, right. And maybe
putting up PII or Phi information, for example. we worked with a financial
advisor company, right? and what they would do is they would take my portfolio
with my name and everything. Copy everything and put it up to ChatGPT. how
should we improve this portfolio now?
Phil Howard: Wow. Genius.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. My portfolio went crazy. So what people don't always
understand is if you go to a public GPT you're writing that on the internet. So
here's the other thing. We work with a couple of suppliers. So then the
customer's like, well I'll just buy my own private version of ChatGPT. I'm like,
okay, you can do that. How about if we could do this for you? How about if we
had what we call an LLM aggregator, someone who already bought a subscription to
the top five, seven, ten LLMs out there. And now when I type in fifty two, and
if I'm the CFO and I go to ChatGPT and said, hey, we're the Smith company,
here's our financials. Where are we at risk? What happens is that, LLM
aggregator will redact any of the PII or company information. We'll put up
general numbers up there. And then when the string comes back it'll repopulate
with Smith Company. So now. Yeah. Go ahead.
Phil Howard: So this is good. It's like most people don't know what an
aggregator is, but try to imagine grok ChatGPT, Claude list a few more, Greg.
All in one dashboard for an IT manager to see all of his active users, what
they're actually chatting, what they're doing, and then give that access to all
those elements maybe to a private drive or what do we want to call it? Single
source of knowledge in dip from that and know that the LMS you're using are
secure, and I know like Debs AI, for example, they're hosting, the LMS on their
private, cloud or whatever. and in the terms and conditions, we're not sharing
your information versus an end user, just, downloading it, and then not only
that, then the cost can be spread, the cost per users, maybe thirty dollars,
forty dollars versus thirty dollars for each individual thing. And then you can
share the tokens across all users because not all users. Now here's the issue
with that model. and I'm going to let Greg ask the issues because I was like,
why don't we do the aggregator? we're paying for this, we're paying for that.
We're paying for all these other ones. He's like, well, I like the interface of
Claude, and I can use the Claude desktop version, which I can't really
necessarily do with an aggregator because I've got to use their interface. So I
mean, I can see for maybe like DevOps guys, if they're going to need maybe each
individual one, but for the general user inside a company, even building agents,
you can use, aggregators for. But Greg, this is where you ask the hard
questions.
Greg Le Dall: Yeah, thank you Phil, it's interesting because the way that we
work together, we really witness everything. And me, I really move from the, as
Mike was saying, the public chat GPT to, now really using AI as a tool around
our use cases. And that's where it becomes very interesting when you can start
to see, LLMs, not just as interface. When you ask questions, back and forth, but
it's really a tool that you can integrate on all your different workflows.
That's what we've been trying to do, you know, with a genetic AI and everything.
Now the main difference and this is where, that would be interesting to have
your point of view, Mike, is, we are a small teams, so it means that we can
really control, you know, what we're sending, we know the data that we share,
the one that we don't. Now, if you expand that on the size of an organization,
this is where I really want the, you know, how can enterprise AI adapt to how
fast it move, how fast it grows? Because we know that usually, it takes a lot of
time, to move to the decision maker that approved maybe the use of this model.
And by the time we use this model, as Phil was saying, you say, now this one is
already, like, there's already two models, you know, that came after and just
blew it up. So. How do you manage that?
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. So, in the past and Phil mentioned we have a DevOps
team in the past, you would tell your DevOps team, go and build this application
for us. You have three months right now. Hey, go build an LLM of billions of
units of data. It's going to take a long time, right? To create your own LLM,
import all your information. I think using an LLM aggregator does two things. It
insulates you from the average user like me, who, I don't know, whatever I put
up there is now in the public domain. I have no idea.
Phil Howard: Like for the user that's using AI, that's better than a search
engine. They're using it to like create reports or use it for XL? Or they're
using it to build PowerPoint presentations, etc.. I'm assuming we're talking
about that user.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. Yeah, that exactly. That user or someone who's like,
hey, help me with this portfolio or help me with this accounting sheet. I don't
understand what's going on or even help me with a cold call script. Right. Those
users. and Greg, correct me if I'm wrong. Certain models are better at certain
verticals than others. like I'm a bit of a fan of gamma to create a PowerPoint
presentation. I think it does a really good job for that. versus a couple of the
other tools is that, is that fair to say, Greg, that some models are better
either vertical or depending on what you want to do?
Greg Le Dall: Yeah, yeah, definitely.
Phil Howard: Share our tech stack, share our tech stack. What do we do without,
without yeah.
Greg Le Dall: Usually like now, for example, me, I'm a big user of, of GPT five
point five. so, if, anyone has been following a bit of the drama that, was
around entropic because entropic, I don't know, it's a really interesting use
case. I could go on for forever on this, but basically they were like the top
leader. Like you remember Phil, I would say, no, no ChatGPT. Forget about
ChatGPT. You know, I cancel my subscription six months ago and now I'm all about
cloud. Why? Because cloud, is just like the ultimate. Now what happened is that
entropic, they started to restrict the, subscription model. So for example, we
used to have the two hundred dollar plan, which is quite a lot of, token
available. And when you combine that with your agent, it's fantastic because now
you can get your agent to go on the web, do some research and build some stuff.
So it's basically, like a one tool, one fit it all. Then after entropic decide,
they decided to restrict the use of the subscription to their ecosystem. So that
means that, for example, me, I built everything around cloud with the
subscription. And now we have a system in place. And if I compare, the price I
would pay with the API, that will go from two hundred dollars a month to, I
don't know, that could be two thousand even more, I think. So that's a good
example of, building something, relying on a provider and then that provider
change a strategy and then that's it. You're producing everything.
Phil Howard: We're producing mass amounts of content based on what we had
recorded off the podcast, I mean, infographics. And like, you would have to tell
me how many steps it was taken to go where. But I remember literally overnight
done like back to the drawing board. Now, if that happened to a manufacturing
company or that happened to someone that had invest, it would be we're a
podcast, right? Like, yeah, it was painful. It was problematic. It was like,
this is why we can't go all in on AI. This is why it's going to be point
solutions, Because we have that argument all the time with our friends. like AI
is going to put DevOps teams out of business. It's gone, it's taking over. And
then overnight, you're kind of like, oh, back to the guy as the DevOps guys that
said, see, I told you, hahaha. I do want to give the audience something of like
value here, so number one, where are you at on your actual AI journey? where do
you actually start? where are all the different points that people are at on
their AI journey? If you need to share a slide or something, go ahead and do
that. But, if you were to, for all the people that you talk with on a daily
basis, CTO CIOs that say, hey, we need help with our AI strategy, I really don't
have time for it. I know that I've got a lot of pressure to be under AI. I'm
completely overwhelmed with how fast things change all the time. Every single
anyone that does not admit that they're not overwhelmed by AI. Let's help
people. Where do we get started?
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. Okay. So in order to have a successful AI project,
you need a successful AI practice. A successful AI practice starts with a
successful AI strategy team. These should be business leaders across multiple,
divisions departments. This team comes up not with what the AI going to do.
Start the other end. They're going to start a business outcomes. I need to know
my strong performers. I need to know when Salesforce or ServiceNow creates a X
level ticket that kicks off X, Y, and Z practice. I need a business outcome of,
if my revenue is dropping X percent across a day, why is that? What are some of
the key triggers? we're on the Zoom platform. So Zoom has a product, AI insight.
I think, where as a leader of the company, why was my service level lower last
Friday? why am I doing this? So it surfaces all this information. We have to
start there. Then we work backwards to find the right AI tools and models to
make that work.
Phil Howard: So how do we know as IT leaders how to surface up whatever outcomes
is that.
Michael Baillargeon: That's a team decision, right? the IT leader is being told,
hey, we need AI in our infrastructure. What does that look like? Right. the
other problem you're going to have is good structured data leads to good
structured AI. Bad unstructured data leads to a bad AI experience. A perfect use
case. So I'm working with this large client, eight hundred contact center agents
on a very modern platform. Yet that modern platform didn't really give some of
the AI experiences that they really wanted. So they brought us in to kind of
talk, the art of the possible of what can be done. And then my very first call
with them, I'm like, okay, what is your single source of truth? And they're
like, oh, we only have like two or three. I'm like, okay, what are they ended up
filled. They had fifteen sources of truth. I said, okay.
Phil Howard: Which were in a very vague, non-descriptive make believe fashion.
What were these sources of truth like? Yeah.
Michael Baillargeon: So you had, Salesforce, you had a CRM, you had an ERP
system, you had two or three sales platform ordering platforms. You had, server
underneath Mary's desks that have been running forever. And every time they go
by.
Phil Howard: This is what they were saying. Their sources of truth were, well,
we got Salesforce.
Michael Baillargeon: To the truth, right? every stakeholder said, well, we use
this and we use that. And the it was like, I had no idea where supporting all
this stuff.
Michael Baillargeon: Right. So in order to get that good AI experience, you need
a collective unify. I want to say single unified source of truth. That's where
knowledge management companies really come in and to help kind of aggregate all
that data and put it all in one spot. So either I can use it as a internal chat.
GPT
Phil Howard: Talk to me for a second. Some people might not know what that is.
this knowledge management type of content. In other words, data cleanup.
Michael Baillargeon: Data cleanup. Yep. Yeah. We used to call it a knowledge
base, but now, marketing gets involved. Phil. So we have to up our terms. Now
it's a knowledge management platform. So what they do is they clean up all your
data that's out there. There's a term called. Redundant, outdated. I don't
remember what the T was.
Michael Baillargeon: I can't remember what it was. So what these platforms do is
look at all the sources of truth, right? From simple stuff like on OneDrive and
In SharePoint, Salesforce, your ERP on the server underneath Mary's desk. It
looks for that rot. What's redundant? What's outdated? Right. The worst thing
you want to do is a agent kind of goes into an FAQ and says, oh yeah, our return
policy is ninety days where that's an outdated policy, right? You got to get rid
of all that. So these knowledge management systems come in and kind of clean
that up. So it can be used. Yes. Again, I'm a bit of a call center guy. It can
be used in the call center in this way. A call comes in. I'm a remote agent.
Question comes in and the question I wasn't trained on. I look to the right.
There's the dog. I look to the left. There's the cat. How am I going to answer
this? I could put the person on hold for ten minutes. I could go into teams
chat. Right? In the old days, when I was in the office, I had the flag I could
raise. Now with AI, AI will automatically surface the right FAQ or the right
document for the agent based upon what it heard the customer say. And you really
need that single database for that because it reaches out for that latest one.
Now once you have.
Phil Howard: The way, the T stands for trivial.
Michael Baillargeon: Trivial. Thank you, thank you. Trivial. So you have to get
that data in order. And now talking non telecom, that data is also really
important for those workflows. it's nothing more than if this happens then do
that. Now it reasons what those then should be. Greg you dropped agentic on here
right. So the biggest difference between conversational and simple generative.
That was if then right. It was if they say this, then do that. If they say this,
then do that. It was like one hundred IFS and one hundred thens. Now with
Agentic, it reasons it. There's one if if this comes in, here's all the thens
that are possible, right. So it should do it a little bit faster. But from an
internal point of view, internal it that data, right. The readiness of that data
will help with all those internal workflows. If this thing kick this off.
Phil Howard: Now comes first, what are we trying to achieve then? Okay, well, do
we have the data that we can? That's a everything but redundant, obsolete and
trivial third thing.
Michael Baillargeon: You have to have the team, with the right stakeholders in
place. And then from an IT perspective, you have to have people ready for this,
right? You have to have a bit of a voice prompting skill set, right? like I
said, conversational with all writing a hundreds of if then statements Agentic
is you have to have the right prompt so there is some training required. Now,
what's nice is when you work with Phil and I and we have a bunch of suppliers,
they do all the training and whatnot. But if your team's not taking, basic voice
prompting classes, you're going to be behind.
Greg Le Dall: Yeah. It's really interesting what you're saying, because, when
Phil, when I was always saying like, yeah, prompt engineering, prompt
engineering, and then there's a term, that came around like a few months ago.
And I think that's really the right term is context engineering. And you really
learn by doing, when you build an agent, because it's really like training an
employee. And I experienced it. I just realized that my data was a mess. I was
always upset against the AI agent. Stop hallucinating. I didn't say to do it
like that. And going into the flow. So AI is always going to try to do its
thing, and figure out by itself, how to come up with something. So that's when
you realize, okay, now I need to have the proper explanation of how it works.
You know, you do this and this and this and that. Repeat after me. Good. You got
it. Okay, let's keep going. Let's keep going. That's really the context. And
Mike, I think that's what you're referring to. You know, clean data. Like
there's no room for, guessing.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah, thirty years ago, we used to call it garbage in.
Garbage out. Right? So you do, COBOL, Fortran programming. Number four. Quattro
Phil everybody's favorite governance, compliance and security. Right.
Phil Howard: So don't kill it all. We should probably just start with that.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah, yeah, yeah. The answer is no. What's the question? So
how do you get to the. Yes. Right. I mean, that sales one hundred and one. I
know we're not really sales people on this call, but, everyone sells in their
own way. But how do you get to that? Yes. So it's incredibly important to
understand if you're in healthcare, what the HIPAA rules are. If you're
government cmmc what those rules are and then where to put. So the term you hear
all the time, right, Phil, is guardrails. Where are those guardrails? most of
the vendors who we work with have those guardrails in place where if we go out
to our LLM, it's going to be to your point earlier, it's our private. LLM it's
not going to be out on the exposed, internet website, whatever it might be. So I
am not a cybersecurity expert. Phil, you have experts on your team who are, I
tend to think that infosec is one of the first conversations you have to have
whenever you have a new project. Now, it doesn't have to include the VP of sales
or the CRO. It can be a separate team. But you got to clear infosec and
governance compliance, right, and regulations upfront before the project even
gets halfway done. And then you realize you spent all this time and energy and
money only to hit a roadblock you just can't get over.
Phil Howard: So if he's on that team to begin with, we gotta have the
stakeholder team. He's just got to be on the stakeholder team like, yeah, one
hundred percent.
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah, you call him doctor? No. Or her doctor? No. Because.
How do you get that to be, doctor? Yes. You have to get them on board with
everything.
Phil Howard: do we have a fifth piece?
Michael Baillargeon: Well, I mean money, I guess money comes into it, right? we
create these business outcomes. Are we going to generate an ROI? I mean, that's
what m I t talked about. it wasn't that they failed. they just didn't generate
the ROI they expected. so, your next Google is to Google the Gartner hype cycle
for artificial intelligence. I tell you what, whoever puts some of these names
together, kudos to you.
Phil Howard: The hype cycle because they are The hype. It's like, how can we
create something before someone calls us it?
Michael Baillargeon: Yeah. So what happens is they get this like sine wave,
right? And in the middle, it's the peak of inflated expectations. Kind of like
my bank account, right. And then what happens is people have all this idea, oh,
AI is going to save us money. It's going to reduce headcount. It's going to give
us a competitive advantage. It's going to be easy. And all of a sudden they drop
way down to the trough of disillusionment. I mean it sounds like a like the
Candyland game right. That's what it sounds like.
Phil Howard: And we're kind of in that trough right now.
Michael Baillargeon: In that trough. Because what happens is CEO says, go get me
some AI. Right. And it's hyped up and then we can't figure it out. And we're
like, we're part of the ninety five percent. But if you put a strategy around
it, I think these five points that Phil was talking about are critical, right?
We want to get the stakeholders involved. We want to make sure we start with the
business outcome. Listen, sales one hundred one. You talk to a salesperson,
they're going to start with a product and they're going to find a solution. The
product is a hammer into a hammer. Everything looks like a nail, right? So what
you want to do is don't start with the vendor. right? Start with the internal
task force strategy team, Tiger team, whatever you want to call it. Have your
business objectives there. Look at your data. Can you aggregate the data? Can
you make it safe? Can you make it one? Is there rot in your data infosec? I got
the data. what guardrails can we put on that data. And then the last one is if
we go through this project and we hit all our markers, it's safe. Secure. It's,
going to generate the business outcome. What's the ROI on that? Microsoft put
out something crazy like people who added AI saw a three hundred percent ROI.
Okay, show me how they got there. Talk about that path because you need that end
to end strategy. Even before you talk to a vendor who can do something for you.
Once you have that in place, then you're ready to look at product set and then
at that point, Phil, as the big question is build versus buy. As I mentioned,
you buy the LLM aggregator as you're making your own LLM to kind of bridge that
gap and make everybody safe. And that's just one idea. That one strategy that we
put together for our clients with those five points.
Phil Howard: Let me make sure I get this straight again. Stakeholders outcome
data, guardrails, ROI sounds good.
Michael Baillargeon: Money comes last. Like you figure out the ROI at the end.
If you do everything right, the ROI should happen.
Phil Howard: Well, I think some of the biggest things are is. the outcome, which
would be. I'm trying to think of other ways to say that it's like, what
challenge do we want to solve with AI?
Michael Baillargeon: Maybe once we once we put AI in, this will happen right.
Phil Howard: Yeah. It's also how do you word that challenge like. So if I think
of some of the challenges that we have, it might be, growth of the podcast, but
that could be what that could be social media, it could be growth of the podcast
on YouTube or whatever. We're primarily a technology leadership focused,
LinkedIn only audio podcast, right? So it's kind of like, is AI the solution to
that? Or is it just by LinkedIn advertising and advertise the podcast and how
does AI fit into that? And then obviously I can do copywriting and all kinds of
other things. So it's not a simple question to answer.
Michael Baillargeon: what about AI scoring of the podcast or the reviews of the
podcast? See what topics really kind of, generated more attention versus you and
me talking about life in New England and guy in New York is like, yeah, I'm
done. Click. Right. so that might be, one area of.
Phil Howard: Let's go, let's use me as the example. I would love some more
examples. So that's a great example. Greg, how have we done that? Because we
have used AI to obviously, look up all of the trending topics. Let's fire away.
let's try to stump Mike.
Greg Le Dall: the research, just confirmed what Mike was saying because, the
first thing was, yeah, I like this one. Most AI roadmaps are built backwards
organizations by tools first. Then they search for use cases.
Michael Baillargeon: You buy a hammer, you look for a nail, Right. Start at the
outcome. Start at want to happen and work backwards.
Phil Howard: And a lot of it guys are going to agree with that. we don't use it
as the it's not the hammer again. Okay. I guess summary theme of this entire
thing. You're an IT leader. Be an IT leader. You first have to have control and
the ear of your stakeholders. Otherwise they're running rogue and wild on you.
So first have your stakeholders AI, round table steering committee, whatever you
want to call it inside your organization, maybe make it unique. That would be
awesome. and maybe do your initial, lunch and learn burrito, specialty day,
whatever it is. and brainstorm what your number one challenges are, outcome
solutions that you want AI to help solve. So now you've got your stakeholders,
you've got your solutions or your challenges that need to be solved. And then we
can help you take care of the rest. We can help you clean up the data. We can
help you put in the security guardrails, and we can help you find and implement
the right products from a vendor neutral perspective without the six figure
Gartner magical price tag. from a vendor neutral standpoint. Sound about right,
Mike?
Michael Baillargeon: Sounds great. it.
Phil Howard: It has been a pleasure having you on the show. Any final words of
wisdom or anything?
Michael Baillargeon: Do not let AI drag you down. It's a journey. It's a
marathon and not a sprint.
Phil Howard: I have another question and I forgot to ask it. Eighteen months
from now? What is your prediction and anything, technology. I mean, actually
could just be anything.
Michael Baillargeon: I think the number of self-driving cars will increase. I
don't know about you, but when I was sixteen, the first thing I want to do jump
in the car and drive it. Now, all these self-driving cars. I do think we'll see
EVs kind of making a bigger comeback, especially with gas pricing. And I do see
more autonomous vehicles on the road.
Phil Howard: That's a great prediction. So okay, Mikey B You've Been Heard.
Michael Baillargeon: Thank you.
Phil Howard: Welcome everyone back to You've Been Heard. so Mike, here's the
thing. I After talking with IT leaders, we realized Nothing gets done in any
company without it touching it. But what we also realized is that whether people

You’ve Been Heard is where IT leaders stop being sidelined and start being amplified. We’re the triple-threat platform: podcast, community and vendor-neutral advisory that elevates your voice, your value, and your influence because when IT leaders rise, so does everything else.
© 2026 You've Been Heard. All rights reserved.